At the table or on the menu: the choice for primary care

26 April 2018

The recently published planning guidance gives sustainability and transformation partnerships (STPs) a prominent role in planning and managing system wide efforts to improve care.  STPs are expected to evolve to become integrated care systems (ICS). The guidance also refers to STPs‘ roles as brokers of primary care networks and creators of system wide resilience.

All of this sends a clear signal to general practices that if they don’t start working together of their own accord, a solution may be imposed on them, possibly by people with no understanding of or interest in general practice.

The need to work at scale was written large in the general practice forward view (GPFV). Simon Stevens’ enthusiasm for the primary care home approach and the subsequent adoption and frequent repetition of the magic population number (30,000 to 50,000) should leave it in no doubt where this is going.

It may not feel like it, but primary care has a strong hand, partly because it holds the first point of contact card. What happens in primary care, and particularly in general practice, has a very big effect on what happens in the rest of the system. There is also a window of opportunity created by the move to new care models.

Plans for integrated care systems seem a very long way off. The multispecialty community provider contract under which some of the first ACO-style systems were to be given life has suffered setbacks. The contractual options for participation designed to attract GPs (virtual, partial and full) have created confusion and inevitably, as GPs tend towards the least binding option, give the contract a watered down appearance.

Meanwhile legal challenges to existing plans by campaign groups worried about the intentions behind ACOs add to the impression that one of the Five Year Forward View’s basic assumptions – of a formal scaling up and coming together of commissioning and provision – is stalling.

Many in general practice have been alarmed by rhetoric about moving care out of hospitals at a time when general practice is under enormous strain. There may even be satisfaction in some corners about the bumpy ride given to ACOs, NHS England’s nervous fiddling with terminology and the legal skirmishes that are delaying progress.

But anyone hoping that life will soon return to normal, that STPs will be quietly disbanded and ICSs shelved is likely to be disappointed.

The same financial and demand pressures that were present in 2014, when the Five Year Forward View was published, are even more acute today. For general practice, the arguments for working together, regardless of the needs of the rest of the system are also as strong as ever.

Practices hoping to employ a workforce with the range of skills needed to expand their business beyond core contracts, and looking to be taken seriously by commissioners need to reach critical mass. They need to modernise their IT, premises and their business processes.

So with or without the pressure to meet the demands of Simon Stevens‘ grand design, practices need to work at scale for their own sake.  They also need to recognise that the current lull in development of ICSs is an opportunity to get themselves in a stronger position. It is very clear that the GP element of the MCP contract and the more general failure to engage GPs in STP plans have slowed the FYFV bandwagon. What GPs choose to do next is the question.

Some will use the next 12 months to get their act together locally. Many will opt for mergers and other vehicles for formal collaboration. Others will take the ultimately more challenging route of less formal working arrangements. The latter group will typically need the support of well- run federations.

Any and all of the above will give local practices a more effective voice in local plans, whether for the purpose of negotiating their own contracts or for setting the direction of the ICS.

Primary care should not undersell itself – but for those not already working with others, it is now time to create links with other practices. Reaching the mandated optimal population size of 30,000 to 50,000 is a start but not an end in itself. Working out how to sustain a larger organisation of whatever kind is the far bigger challenge. At the same time as they are dealing with the internals, practices will also need to keep an eye on the outside world. This is the time to claim a place at the planning table with the STP.

The do-nothing option is of course still available. Survival is not compulsory.

Tips for general practices

  1. If you are not already working in a group that covers 30,000 to 50,000 minimum take steps to do so now
  2. If you are in some form of federation or alliance, ask yourself if the group is fit for purpose
  3. If you don’t take part in the integration agenda, you risk being run by it
  4. What can you do together that will benefit the group – can you share workforce, rationalise back office functions or find new ways to bring in income?
  5. Bring others with you – communicate what the group can do, how it will benefit every practice, particularly bearing in mind the resilience and sustainability of individual practices. Leave the door open for practices even if they are initially reluctant to get involved
  6. Engage with other groups of practices working together – and where it is sensible to share functions or deliver services across a larger footprint, start these discussions
  7. Share the vision for primary care in your local area – is it in line with the STP? If not, sit down with the STP and agree a vision you can all support
  8. Identify who is leading the STP in your area, and find out who is representing general practice at the planning discussions. Engage with the STP and get primary care seen as a key partner with a clear direction and vision that is owned across the groups of practices

The resilience funding in the GPFV is only partly about shoring up struggling practices. It’s also about finding ways to work together that benefit practices and their patients. It can help to have a neutral third party involved in leading these discussions, helping you map out the options and alternatives, the risks and opportunities, and the hurdles you need to overcome. PCC has helped many groups of practices to work together. For further information contact enquiries@pcc-cic.org.uk

Resources Leadership and engagement

Latest News

Practice team development: care navigation and signposting

24 January 2019

Reception staff can make a big difference to workload and the smooth running of the practice by making sure patients see the most appropriate professional. Active signposting is the first of the ten high impact actions (HIAs) to release time for care set out in the GP Forward View. According to NHS England active signposting “provides patients with a first point of contact which directs them to the most appropriate source of help”.

PCC’s care navigation and signposting session empowers the reception team to offer choices to patients enabling them to make informed decisions about their care and how to access the most appropriate professional first time. The session examines models of care navigation and the fundamentals of signposting and social prescribing (HIA number 8). It then goes on to consider how roles within the reception and admin team can evolve to enable staff to deliver what they’ve learnt. Contact enquiries@pcc-cic.org.uk for more information.

Read More

Leeds first city to fully join up with GP Connect

23 January 2019

NHS Digital is ensuring that clinicians have access to patients’ GP records right across Leeds.

The GP Connect service allows GP practices and authorised clinical staff to share and view GP records digitally and allows them to make better decisions about a patient’s care. This means that clinicians in hospitals across the city will be able to access patients’ previous encounters with GPs, improving the data link between the care received at primary and secondary care.

The service is available to all GP practices in Leeds after GP system supplier TPP last month joined EMIS Health in implementing GP Connect.

Read More

RCGP figures show access to GPs is lowest for 15 years

23 January 2019

The Royal College of GPs has compared population statistics with figures from NHS Digital to show that the ratio of GPs to the overall population is at its lowest for 15 years. In 2017 there were 6.19 full-time equivalent GPs per 10,000 population compared to 6.56 in 2007. The ratio is the lowest it has been since 2004. Figures for 2018 are not yet available.

Read More

Plea for feedback on e-referral service leaflet

23 January 2019

More patients are now using the NHS e-referral service which allows patients to book their own hospital appointments. NHS Digital has asked practices to comment on the materials used to promote the service via a short survey.

Read More

Equity and health services

23 January 2019

Governments around the world are determined to eradicate unfair differences in health care access, quality and health outcomes. This paper from York University summarises the methods for analysing health equity to help policymakers with the allocation of health sector resources.

Read More